39ème Congrès | Groupe Francophone d'Hépatologie-Gastroentérologie et Nutrition Pédiatriques
D I J O N 2 9 – 3 1 M A R S 2 0 1 8
ATRESIE DES VOIES BILIAIRES:
le choix des donneurs en cas de greffe
Dr Roberto TAMBUCCI
Unité de Chirurgie et Transplantation Pédiatriques
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Université catholique de Louvain
B R U X E L L E S
BILIARY ATRESIA (BA) is
the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation
RH SQUIRES et al, HEPATOLOGY, July 2014
RH SQUIRES et al, HEPATOLOGY, July 2014
At least 80% of patients with BA
are transplanted by 20 years of age,
with the majority transplanted
under 4 years of age.
Indications to LT for BA patients
- ongoing cholestasis, decompensated biliary cirrhosis
- cholangitis,
- portal hypertension with or without variceal hemorrhage,
- poor weight gain,
- fat soluble vitamin deficiencies,
- hepatopulmonary syndrome,
- porto-pulmonary hypertension,
- and rarely hepatocellular carcinoma.
Rapidly
downhill !!!
1000 liver transplantations in 882 children …
1993 - 2015
(since the beginning of our living-donor liver transplantation program)
342 BA patients
out of 609 patients (56,1%)
median age IQR range
Biliary Atresia 342 patients 0,97 yy 0.73-1.89 0.32-15.69
Others 267patients 3.89 yy 1.78-8.13 0.09-22.39
TOT 609 patients
p < 0.0001
Median age at LT
(CUSL data)
77.2% of BA patients : LT before 2 years of age
small child
requires
small graft
Types of liver grafts
1. Whole organ (1963)
Types of liver grafts
2. Reduced size (1984)
Types of liver grafts
3. Split-liver (1988)
Types of liver grafts
4. Living related grafts (1990)
Types of liver grafts
More recent frontiers:
Monosegmental grafts
Types of liver grafts
More recent frontiers:
Donation After Cardiac Death (DCD)
Indications in children???
Size of grafts
How do you determine the appropriate parenchymal mass for adequate function?
• Estimated liver volume
LV (mL) = 706.2 × BSA (m
2
) + 2.4
or
LV (mL) = 2.223 × BW (kg)
0.426
× height (cm)
0.682
• Graft to Recipient Weight Ratio (GRWR)
1-3% is optimum
< 0.7% survival will suffer-insufficient liver mass
Size of grafts
Practical Application
• Whole organ – Donor weight 1/3 above or below that of recipient is
appropriate
• Left Latetal Segments = donor/recipient wt ~10:1
• Left lobe = donor/recipient wt ~5:1
• Right Lobe = donor/recipient wt ~1:1
Size of grafts
Recipient Donor
(whole liver)
Donor
(reduced/split)
Segments
(reduced/split)
8kg, without ascites 6-10 kg 40-60 kg II+III
8kg, with ascites 6-15 kg 40-70 kg II+III
20 kg 15-25 kg 40-50 kg
50-70 kg
II+III+IV
II+III
30 kg 25-35 kg 50-80 kg II+III+IV
40 kg 30-50 kg 60-90 kg II+III+IV
Our experience
1. Organ allocation in EuroTranplant:
- Almost no facilitation for pediatric patients
(except: donor < 16 years)
- No facilitation for split-grafts
2. >90% from abroad:
- Not eligible for deceased donor
Our experience
Implementation of
Living Donor Liver Transplantation program
Our experience
12
11
11
4
5
3
7
5
1
2
2
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Post-mortem donors
Living donors
Living donor liver transplantation for children:
Which added value ?
• For the liver recipient ?
• For the living donor ?
• For the institution ?
• For the community ?
• In a global perspective ?
Living donor liver transplantation for children:
• Alleviates cadaveric organ donor shortage
• Reduces pre-transplant mortality
• Allows nutritional preparation of LT candidates
• Improves post-transplant survival (biliary atresia)
• Allows timely LT in oncological indications
Living donor liver transplantation for children:
Ethical principles of living donation
•Risks (D) and benefits (R)
•Selection of the living donor
•Informed consent
Living donor liver transplantation for children:
Need
Recipient
outcome
Risk to the
living donor
Equipoise
Risks for the living donor
Safety first ….
Quality improvement in living liver donation
(NY State Committee, Dec 2002)
« The well being of the donor should be a primary
consideration of any live donor organ transplantation »
World mortality in living donors
of a left liver lobe:
0,1%
Our series (CUSL, first 350 living donor)
• Mortality: 0%
• Morbidity:
* Blood bank transfusion: 1-2%
* Post-operative pain: 82% !
* Biliary fistula: 6%
* Incisional hernia: 3%
* Pleural effusion: 2%
* Nerve compression: 1%
* Persisting disabibility: 0%
• Hospitalization: 4-11 days
Informed consent in living donation
1st Informed
consent
Living
donation
2nd Informed
consent
Medical/psychosocial
work-up
Medical advocate
Pre-operative work-up in living donor candidates
• Parental relationship with the recipient
• Medical history and physical examination
• Body mass index < 27, no liver steatosis
• Biochemistry (thromphilic work-up)
• Pre-operative work-up (ECG, Thorax Xray, Spirometry,
Anesthesiology)
• Liver imagery (echography, MRI)
• Psychological assessment
• INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ADVOCATE
Benefits for the donor
Emotional consequences
of living donation must be better understood:
•Positive consequences
•Negative consequences ?
Our results in BA recipients
p < 0.0001
BA vs other recipients results (CUSL 1993-2015)
(patient survival)
0 5 10 15 20 25
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
TIME (years)
<2y - Living D
<2y - Deceased D
>2y - Living D
>2y - Deceased D
0 5 10 15 20 25
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
TIME (years)
<2y - Living D
<2y - Deceased D
>2y - Living D
>2y - Deceased D
0 5 10 15 20 25
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
TIME (years)
<2y - Living D
<2y - Deceased D
>2y - Living D
>2y - Deceased D
OVERALL
PATIENT SURVIVAL
OVERALL
GRAFT SURVIVAL
p 0,1607 Overall
p 0,0156 < 2 yy DD vs LD
p 0,8099 > 2 yy DD vs LD
p 0,0008
p 0,0001
p 0,6724
BA recipients results (CUSL 1993-2015)
p=0.041
p=0.512
n=79
n=48
n=27
n=51
Maternal donation
Paternal donation
Maternal donation
Paternal donation
Maternal vs Paternal donation
Take home messages
BA is the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation
Patients are often transplanted < 2 years of age
Their clinical status could get worse wickly, waiting for an organ
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)
is a good and safe alternative to deceased donor
In our series, best results are obteined
when LDLT is performed before the age of 2 years
Merci!
roberto.tambucci@uclouvain.be
raymond.reding@uclouvain.be